click to show more information

click to hide/show information About your Search

20121001
20121031
SHOW
Hannity 26
( more )
STATION
FOXNEWSW 179
FOXNEWS 177
CNN 65
CNNW 65
MSNBC 44
MSNBCW 44
FBC 31
CNBC 13
CSPAN 13
WUSA (CBS) 12
KPIX (CBS) 9
KQED (PBS) 8
WETA 7
CSPAN2 5
KRCB (PBS) 5
( more )
LANGUAGE
English 718
Search Results 0 to 49 of about 718 (some duplicates have been removed)
it was, and five days later susan rice goes out on five television shows. >> right. >> with a script saying this is as a result goof a spontaneous protest, it was not preplanned and not premeditated. the president said they did no mislead anybody. they did misld a country. the question is did they d ceive the country or was the intelligence so bad that it did not get to the top guys, but it did not get out to the country? so it wautter incompetence or deceit and deception. >> or was it criminal? >> no. >> it is not criminal? >> no. they lied. they may have lied, we don't know. i don't think susan rice did. i think she was sent out. i think carney was sent out. >> no legal rap here? >> no. >> there will be an opportunityr for a longer discussion about this in the foreign policy debate deon monday. the president said t's have a longer conversation. secondly, romney did blow it in the debate. there was an opportunity there maybe he could have made the t' case, as egregious as it is, that you made in a short amount of time. but what are you trying to claim here? that there's some desor
of it, it was complex attack. >> ambassador kennedy defended ambassador susan rice who fiv ae rounds on sunday talk shows as it was a demonstration, prompted by a youtube video for anti-islam film that spun out of control. >> if any of the administration officials including any career official, were on television on sunday, september 16, they would have said what ambassador rice said. >> challenged repeatedly by a republican who returned from the region. i was in libya and nobody mentioned a video. >> in the year leading up to the attack, ied attack on the consulate in june, lawmakers were told that triply could not control the american interest. >> we could not rely on them for security, intelligence and law enforcement help to identify the emerging threat. or ask them for assistance mitigating the threat. >> newly released e-mails and testimony, one team dominated. official washington was preoccupied with reducing the number of american security personnel at the consulate and replacing them with libyan guard. even after series of attacks on diplomats. lieutenant colonel andrew wood
in this attack. >> september 16th, u.s. board to the united nations susan rice goes on five sunday talk shows calling the attack "spontaneous." >> in fact, this was not a preplanned, premeditated attack. >> september 17th -- >> simply on the basis of what ambassador rice has publicly disclosed, does the united states government regard what happened in benghazi as an act of terror in. >> again, i'm not going to put labels on this until we have a complete investigation, okay? >> so you don't regard it as an act of terrorism? >> i don't think we know enough. i don't think we know enough. >> september 18th on the david letterman show -- >> is this an act of war? are we at war here? what happens here? >> here's what happened. you had a video that was released by somebody who lives here, sort of a shadowy character who is a extremely offensive video directed at muhammad -- >> making fun of the prophet muhammad. >> making fun of the prophet muhammad. so this caused great offense if much of the muslim world, but what also happened was extremists and terrorists used this as an excuse to attack a varie
. >> this interview... >> chris: the first u.s. ambassador killed since 1979. susan rice came on this show and five others and gave the american people a story that turned out not to be true and you are saying we shouldn't discuss this and wait for the investigation to be completed? >> no. no. >> chris: that is what you just said. >> chris, calm down, that is obviously not what i am saying. >> chris: you said that we should follow the lead of chris stevens' father... >> i'm happy, i'm happy to discuss it with you. and i do think that it is worthy of discussion. i think that that is different than the manner in which governor romney has conducted himself and it is not just me who attacked him for the way he handled this. he was roundly criticized by people from right to left, the republican establishment and the democratic establishment. >> chris: you are talking about what he said the day after the attack. >> and he is -- >>... except the obama campaign. >> well, i am just telling you from the beginning of the issue, before any facts were known, he was brazenly drying to e lly tr it and i understan
into the story and don't be pulling diaries out of the rubble? >> what i heard her say, hey, susan rice misspoke. >> jon: the u.s. ambassador a few days to say this was all just a spontaneous attack and responsible taken chris demonstration? >> what we saw from the secretary of state don't jump to conclusions. however, she should have said that to the u.s. ambassador to the u.n. susan rice because she judged to conclusions and told us unequivocally what happened. i'm perplexed as to why the media has not gone to susan rice as a follow-up, what were you talking about? because the facts have now proven you to be wrong. where the u.n. press corps. where the state department press corps? >> she does not make herself very available. >> jon: she was very available on sunday morning. >> but then when you try to talk to her at united nations she will come out and make a few statements and then she is gone. >> now, look, when i heard secretary clinton say that, let's get to that after the elections, do us one favor and you can investigation all you want. >> i think at the same time susan rice was making
great an anti terror policy obama had. they deceived the country, sending susan rice out on the sunday shows and attending that this was the outcrop -- outgrowth of a demonstration. everybody over the age of nine could see that it was premeditated. that is why it was suppressed until it could no longer be suppressed. >> i am not aware of the conspiracy that charles has his own strange and wonderful sources -- >> how do you explain her -- >> i am going to try to explain my moderator's question about this. the problems were pulle -- the problem republicans have is that mitt romney has never c cracked the threshold of being a po it does punish the obama record, and there's no question that osama bin laden took the wind out of the cells of the republican candidates. it was an enormous credential for obama. but because romney chose paul ryan, he in no way filled out the emptiness of his own resume in foreign policy. for that reason, he has not been able to exploit what should be an advantage. >> can you explain why susan rice insisted that the attack on the embassy was the result of a demon
to the tv appearances made by the u.n. ambassador susan rice on sunday, september 16. in which, she pressed the idea now discredited that the benghazi murders were not premeditated but grew out of a protest that spun out of control. ambassador rice also spoke about the precautions taken before 9/11. >> the security personnel, the state department thought were required were in place. >> clearly that judgment turned out to be wrong. fox news learned that the coming hours will bring significant new details about the state department pre9/11 security decisions in benghazi from house lawmakers, bret, who have been reviewing classified documents in this case. >> bret: we'll follow all of that. thank you. please join me for a special look at the libya terror attack friday night. a one-hour presentation, "special report" investigates death and deceit in benghazi. it can be seen tomorrow at 10:00 p.m. eastern. so set the dvr. the clock many in washington hear ticking louder every day is countdown to the end of the year and what is the fiscal cliff. it's fast approaching. chief white house correspond
knowing the facts. susan rice obviously did not have all the packfacts. this was just a reaction to the film. i don't think there's a coverup. i think this is a situation where they demand more and they say more, but they said too much in the beginning. but that is not a cover-up. >> it is a lousy one and one that unravel very quickly by their own hand. they are the ones who had been providing -- we all know that there are ways to drag defeat and prevent this from going to a hearing. >> there was no demonstration. there was not a mob. there was no reaction to what happened in cairo. there -- that was a complete invention. if you look at the video of susan rice on the five shows, she was screaming in terror with all of this investment of the maas and none of it was remotely true. what we are learning now is that, from the first day, the people on the ground look down on the video cameras and saudi ambassador walked out with a turkish delegate at half past 8:00 p.m. in the evening. there's no one on the street. the attack happened an hour and 10 minutes later. they knew there was n
comments by susan rice saying the attacks were not preplanned. not the work of terror, were four days after that. this does not add up. intelligence committee chairman mike rogers is our exclusive guest, but first, elyse has the latest. you have been breaking this, this latest story about the white house choosing to leave information out. what are your sources saying as to why the white house left out key points. like the fact that this was a terrorist attack. >> the kronology, the day after the attack, my sources were telling me this was a preplanned military style assault indication there were terrorists involved. then as the days gone by, even though my sources continued to tell me this was preplan ned, te white house started using these talking points. no sources were saying there was any evidence of a mob and these talking points were delivered by susan rice on sunday even though there were officials that continued to say it was a -- and use those points when official say listen, this was the best information that susan rice was given. administration talking points at the time, but you
. and, quite frankly, susan rice, on your show on september 16, the president on the 18th, the and the 25th, kept talkin talking about an attack inspired by a video. they're trying to sell a narrative, quite frankly, that the middle east, the wars are receding and al qaeda's been dismantled, and to admit that our embassy was attacked by al qaeda operatives and libya leading from behind didn't work. i think undercut that narrative. they never believed the media would investigate. congress was out of session, and this caught up with them. i think they have been misleading us, but it finally caught up with them. >> schieffer: well, that is a very serious charge you just leveled, senator graham. >> uh-huh. >> schieffer: are you saying the administration deliberately misled the american people to make it look as if terrorism i is-- is not as much of a threat as apparently it is? >> either they are misleading the american people or incredibly incompetent. there was no way with anybody looking at all that you could believe five days after the attack it was based on a riot that ne
defended ambassador susan rice who five days after the attack made rounds on sunday talk shows as it was a demonstration, prompted by a youtube video for anti-islam film that sn f of t ininyeeffl, on television on sunday, september 16, they would have said what ambassador rice said. >> challenged repeatedly by a republican who returned from the region. i was in libya and nobody mentiod a video. >> in the yeareading up to the attack, ied attack on the consulate in june, lawmakers reoldhaplou colmen re >>conoelnm for security, intelligence and law enforcement help to identify the emerging threat. or ask them for assistance mitigating the threat. >> newly released e-mails and testimony, one team dominated prupwiucgsngtoas pene tsund acthit libyan guard. even after seriesf attacks on diplomats. lieutenant colonel andrew wood recently oversaw military security for the consulate. >> we were the last flag flying in benghazi. we werehe lt tn ea drage reeetok its own action. >> the fact is that since 2011, the house has cut embassy security by hundreds of millions of dollars. beloamount
saying the administration's response was inept and ignorant and susan rice blaming it on a spontaneous protest was inexcusable. >> it's either willful ignorance or abysmal ignorance to think people come to spontaneous demonstrations with mortars and heavy weapons pant attack goes on for hours. bill: both sides are complaining. governor romney's team says the white house is still getting its story mixed up. >> reporter: democrats say republicans are politicizing the tragic attack that cost of life of four americans. the republicans say the white house is cover ugging up the details for political reasons. here is axlerod. >> the president called it an act of terror the day after it happened. but when you are the responsible party, when you are the administration and you have a responsibility to act on what you know and what the intelligence community believed. >> reporter: actually it was several days after the benghazi attack before the white house called it terrorism and that came after the national terrorism chief called it aterror attack. >> i think now based on the recommendations o
moemds committee demands the resignation of u.s. ambassador susan rice, we're going to also ask him whether attorney general eric holder must go now that dozens more guns have been found and hundreds more deaths have been caused by those guns in the fast and furious debacle. the real losers in this was mexico. it's an incredible story and it gets worse and worse, mr. king is going to join me later. >>> up next, the obama care supreme court? a they are back on the court with blockbuster cases. free market capitalism is the best path to prosperity. none of this bernanke stuff, i can't stand it. we'll be right back, more to come. mike rowe here at a ford tell me fiona, who's having a big tire event? your ford dealer. who has 11 major brands to choose from? your ford dealer. who's offering a rebate? your ford dealer. who has the low price tire guarantee... affording peace of mind to anyone who might be in the market for a new set of tires? your ford dealer. i'm beginning to sense a pattern. buy four select tires, get a $60 rebate. use the ford service credit credit card, get $60 more. t
, terror. susan rice -- on the 17th, the spokeswoman asked if she regarded it as an act of terrorism, i don't think we know enough. then on september 25th on "the view" when the president was asked about it, he said there's no doubt the ongoing assault, that it wasn't just a mob action, which was still unclear. why what appears to be a real hesitancy to use the formal words? >> i think it was a recognition that this was an extraordinarily complicated situation in benghazi. it was difficult to get accurate information and what precise ly went on. in fact, that's why the president, actually, the secretary of state, calleded on ak bass dor thomas pickering to conduct a formal inquiry. >> why did they say it was linked to a movie? >> here's the situation. one, there was a hour long attack if you will on the legation in benghazi. it was clear and the president said the day after, this was an act of terror. this was not an accidental occurrence. it wasn't, and i don't think he made any reference to the video in the context of the attack on the ligation. but it's not clear. still trying to establi
in banghazi. the question is why did they send susan rice out? why i was it necessary for her to go out on five shows and say it was spontaneous. why not saying we have an ongoing investigation. i'm not going to say more. we're going to learn more. >> secretary clinton believes that ambassador rice has done a superb job. let's just start that. we completely reject calls here in this building. >> at a time when most americans would want to rally around our country at the death of four americans serving our country, instead we've had this bizarre response, which only leads to me believe there was, number one, there was gross negligence involved, or the president doesn't want us to realize libya may be a failed state in the fbi agents can't even make into banghazi. >> i watched the presentation. i thought it was amazing that someone in her position would go on with that degree of certainty, that fast, and that authoritatively and be that wrong. >> did you know the chairman of the homeland security committee has asked for susan rice to resign? does the president have 100% confidence in susa
that was true and that the state department thought that. it is unimaginable to me that susan rice believed that was true. i think she went out on that sunday because no one else would do it and i think it was an utterly political act. >> chris: bob as one of the key people who broke the water gate scandal and i'm ho not comparig this to that. as you look at what happened in benghazi the changing story of what happened as you look at the security warnings beforehand are you troubled by the actions of the obama administration? >> yeah. there are lots of unanswered questions and i love documents and they released some documents in this and if you two go and look at the original request for more security they say our policy, our goal here is to shift from an emergency footing to normalize the security relationship. now, this is in march, six, seven months ago. any one looking that the say wait a minute, read the document in which they say the situation is incredibly unstable. why are you trying to normalize your security in a situation that is visibly unstable? you even acknowledge that. so yo
? was it's a lie? >> i think that susan rice needs to step down. one of two things occurred. either she saw the intelligence and decided she was going to nuance or tweak and say what she said, calling it's a response to the video, or she was told by those above her to go out and say this was a response to the video. >> eithe either ambassador rices deliberately misleading the american people or showed such a lack of knowledge or sophistication she shouldn't told that position anymore. >> today we see things differently. i mean, we see the thing unravel in banghazi. the question is why did they send susan rice out? why i was it necessary for her to go out on five shows and say it was spontaneous. why not saying we have an ongoing investigation. i'm not going to say more. we're going to learn more. >> secretary clinton believes that ambassador rice has done a superb job. let's just start that. we completely reject calls here in this building. >> at a time when most americans would want to rally around our country at the death of four americans serving our country, instead we've had this bizar
are outright lies. that is susan rice. she talked to me personally. she said this is the way it was. because of this film that came out. she said a lot more too. new york republican peter king, chairman of house homeland security committee. welcome back to "america's newsroom". >> thank you, bill, very much. bill: what do you say to that mother? >> the administration should realize what happens when you lie to the american people. there are real consequences to real people. they should teller what they said before they realized was wrong and teller the absolute truth and tell the american people as well. bill: there is no doubt in your mind they lied? that's what they said. >> at very least they distorted truth for their own political purposes yeah. as far as the mother is concerned she considers it a lie. her son was killed. she was given information that they had to know was wrong. bill: this is timeline you're about to watch here, various members the administration talking about terrorist attacks and various films t runs 15 to 17 days in september. just roll this and watch it. >> we've se
. there was not a mob. that was a complete invention. if you look at the video of susan rice on the five shows, none of that is even remotely true. what we have learned and what we're learning now is that, from the first day, the people on the ground looked out on the video cameras and saudi ambassador walkout with the turkish delegate at half past 8:00 p.m. in the evening. there was no one on the stet. the attack happened an hour and 10 minutes later. and they had communicated that with the state department. everybody knew. this is not believable. either susan rice is completely clueless, then why is she out there and why is she inventing, or she knew, but after a week of spiking football over al qaeda and osama bin laden, they did not want to admit that was al qaeda on the run killing the first inveor in 30 years. >> i hear what charles has to say and it really gets into the dark conspiracy area. the idea that you come out of the convention and something like this happens and then we have a master conspiracy to contain it, knowing that, in and of the late -- knowing that, inevitably, it will come
. if you'd look at the of susan rice on the five shows, and she was talking about the screaming and terrist and embellishment in the crowd none of that was remotely true. fromom the first day t people on the ground oked out on the video cameras and saudi ambassador walked out with a tuturkish delegate at half past 8:00 p.m. in the evening. there is no one inn the street. it had happenened and our intense later. everybody in the embassy kneww that there was none of this and th had communicated that with the state department. evererybody knew. th is not believable. either susan rice is completely clueless, then why is she out there and why is she inventing or she knew, after a week of spiking a ftball over al qaeda and osama bin laden they did not want to admit that wasl qaeda on the run killing our ambassador the first one in0 years. >> i hear what charles has to say and it really gets into the dark c conspirac area. the idea that you come out of the convention and something like this happens and we the have a master conspiracy to contain it knowinghat, inevitably, it will come out -- you ha
. >> everybody's suddenly saying we knew from day one. but we have yet to hear from susan rice who was saying, this was because of the video. a lot of people have asked me why would they lie about something so critically important? the reason they are doing it is because they have to get the american people to believe that this president has been an effective national security president. but in fact, al qaeda is on the rise. >> sean: the lie always makes things worse. this is just the beginning of the investigation. good to see you. >> thanks? >> coming up, fox news asked jay carney point blank if the administration meant to mislead you about the benghazi attack. we will check in with michelle malkin. and steve wynnn unleashes on president obama and his business policies. [ ryan ] it doesn't get any better than endless shrimp at red lobster. u can mix and match all day! [ male announcer ] don't miss red lobster's endless shrimp, just $14.99! try as mu as you like, an way you like! like parmesan crusted shrimp. hurry in, offer ends soon! i'm ryan isabell and i see food differently. hurry in, o
americans from the start. >> raising questions why u.s. ambassador to the u.n. susan rice claimed it was spontaneous reaction to protests over about islam film. as well as this claim by white house spokesman jay carney on september 18. our initial information, that includes all information, we saw no evidence to back up claims by others that this was a preplanned, or premeditated attack, that we saw evidence it was sparked by the reaction to the video. >> today, carney downplayed the e-mails noting they include nonclassified information called from social -- culled from social media flights telling reporters aboard air force one -- >> i and others made very clear that our preliminary statements were preliminary and an investigation was underway and as more facts became available we would make the american people aware of them. >> today, secretary of state hillary clinton backed up the white house account. >> posting something on facebook is not in and of itself evidence. i think it is under scores how fluid the reporting was at the time and continued for some time to be. >> carney
Search Results 0 to 49 of about 718 (some duplicates have been removed)